When does Taylor Fritz play next? How to watch American player at 2025 WimbledonNew Foto - When does Taylor Fritz play next? How to watch American player at 2025 Wimbledon

American Taylor Fritzlooks to move onto the fourth round ofWimbledonwhen he faces No. 27 Alejandro Davidovich Fokina on July 4. Fritz, the No. 5-ranked player in the world, defeated Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard in the first round and Gabriel Diallo in the second round to set up the third-round matchup with Davidovich Fokina. Both of Fritz's wins so far came in five sets, with him needing three consecutive set wins over Perricard in the first round. REQUIRED READING:What surface is Wimbledon played on? What to know Fritz has faced Davidovich Fokina twice already in 2025, and the two are 1-1 against each other. Fritz defeated Davidovich Fokina 6-3, 3-6, 6-1 at the Eastbourne tournament, before Davidovich Fokina won 7-6, 7-6 at Delray Beach. Fritz is still looking for his first Grand Slam win of his career. The Ranchos Palos Verdes, California, native's best finish at Wimbledon is the quarterfinals, which he reached in 2022 and 2024. Here's when Fritz's next Wimbledon matchup is, along with how to watch: Time:8:30 a.m. ET Date:Friday, July 4 Location:All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club (Wimbledon, London) Fritz's third-round matchup against Davidovich Fokina is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. ET on Friday, July 4, in Wimbledon, London. TV channel:ESPN Streaming:ESPN app, ESPN+ Fritz vs. Davidovich Fokina will air live on ESPN+, which requires a subscription. Wimbledon matches will also air on ESPN, with the network bouncing between different matchups, starting at 6 a.m. ET. Here are Fritz's results at Wimbledon in 2025: First round:Taylor Fritz defeats Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard 6-7, 6-7,6-4, 7-6, 6-4 Second round:Taylor Fritz defeats Gabriel Diallo 3-6,6-3, 7-6,4-6,6-3 This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:When does Taylor Fritz play next at 2025 Wimbledon?

When does Taylor Fritz play next? How to watch American player at 2025 Wimbledon

When does Taylor Fritz play next? How to watch American player at 2025 Wimbledon American Taylor Fritzlooks to move onto the fourth round of...
Mavericks would only be interested in LeBron James 'in a buyout situation': ReportNew Foto - Mavericks would only be interested in LeBron James 'in a buyout situation': Report

Don't count the Dallas Mavericks in for another league-altering trade with the Los Angeles Lakers this year. "Dallas, I'm told that they would only be interested in LeBron [James] in a buyout situation," ESPN's Dave McMenamin reported Thursday on ESPN Radio 710 in Los Angeles. In other words,ifJames were to become a free agent, the Mavericks would be interested. "Dallas—I'm told—they would only be interested in LeBron [James] in a buyout situation." -@mcten👀#MFFL(🎥:@ESPNRadio)pic.twitter.com/b0Tle0eFXh — Kevin Gray Jr. (@KevinGraySports)July 3, 2025 That's a big "if" and so is James actually relocating. But the all-time great's status has been closely monitored around the league ever since his agent, Rich Paul,gave ESPN a statementindicating the conditionality of James' commitment to the Lakers, even after he picked up his $52.6 million player option with the organization over the weekend. "LeBron wants to compete for a championship," Paul told ESPN. "He knows the Lakers are building for the future. He understands that, but he values a realistic chance of winning it all. We are very appreciative of the partnership that we've had for eight years with Jeanie [Buss] and Rob [Pelinka] and consider the Lakers as a critical part of his career. "We understand the difficulty in winning now while preparing for the future. We do want to evaluate what's best for LeBron at this stage in his life and career. He wants to make every season he has left count, and the Lakers understand that, are supportive and want what's best for him." James is a 40-year-old, four-time NBA champion that is still hungry for another title. The pressure has been on the Lakers this week to support James with a championship-caliber roster. They took a hit Monday when versatile frontcourt pieceDorian Finney-Smith agreed to sign with the Houston Rockets. Los Angeles has since made moves to bring oncenter Deandre Aytonand reserve forward Jake LaRavia. The question remains, however, if the Lakers will have enough to satisfy James, who has won one championship since joining the franchise in 2018. As for Dallas, the Mavericks could be an attractive landing spot for James, given his ties to Kyrie Irving and Anthony Davis. James won a championship with Irving in Cleveland and another with Davis in Los Angeles, and he'd not only join them but also a five-time All-Star and four-time NBA champ in Klay Thompson. The Mavericks' roster is now headlined by No. 1 overall pick Cooper Flagg, who, like James, is another do-it-all forward. But again, according to McMenamin, the Lakers would have to buy out James' contract for the Mavericks to be interested in adding the four-time league MVP. James notably has a no-trade clause in his Lakers contract. So if he did want to be traded, he would have control over his destination. But McMenamin has his doubts about James leaving the Lakers. "Let's keep bringing this up because I don't think it's getting enough attention," McMenamin said on ESPN Radio 710 in Los Angeles. "His son's on the Lakers. So he's going to go get a trade away from his son?" McMenamin emphasized that packaging LeBron James and Bronny James in a deal would prove difficult because of how much their contracts would cost together.

Mavericks would only be interested in LeBron James 'in a buyout situation': Report

Mavericks would only be interested in LeBron James 'in a buyout situation': Report Don't count the Dallas Mavericks in for anoth...
Wimbledon: No. 1 Jannik Sinner moves into the 3rd round with a straight-set victory over VukicNew Foto - Wimbledon: No. 1 Jannik Sinner moves into the 3rd round with a straight-set victory over Vukic

LONDON (AP) — Top-rankedJannik Sinnermoved intoWimbledon'sthird round with a 6-1, 6-1, 6-3 victory over Aleksandar Vukic of Australia at Centre Court on Thursday. Sinner had 38 winners and just 11 unforced errors in the 1-hour, 40-minute match and saved all four break points he faced. The owner of three Grand Slam titles advanced to face 52nd-ranked Pedro Martinez of Spain on Saturday. Wimbledon is the only major tournament whereSinnerhas yet to reach a final; he lost in the 2023 semifinals at the All England Club. He won the Australian Open each of the past two years, won theU.S. Openlast September and was therunner-up to Carlos Alcaraz at the French Openlast month. Sinner took the first two sets in that final and held three championship points before Alcaraz came back to win. ___ AP tennis:https://apnews.com/hub/tennis

Wimbledon: No. 1 Jannik Sinner moves into the 3rd round with a straight-set victory over Vukic

Wimbledon: No. 1 Jannik Sinner moves into the 3rd round with a straight-set victory over Vukic LONDON (AP) — Top-rankedJannik Sinnermoved in...
The House gives final approval to Trump's big tax bill in a milestone for his second-term agendaNew Foto - The House gives final approval to Trump's big tax bill in a milestone for his second-term agenda

WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans propelled PresidentDonald Trump'sbig multitrillion-dollar tax breaks and spending cuts billto final passage Thursday in Congress, overcoming multiple setbacks to approve his signature second-term policy package before a Fourth of July deadline. The tight roll call, 218-214, came at a potentially high political cost, with two Republicans joining all Democrats opposed. GOP leaders worked overnight and the president himself leaned on a handful of skeptics to drop their opposition. Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York delayed voting for more than eight hours by seizing control of the floor with arecord-breaking speechagainst the bill. Trump celebrated his political victory in Iowa, where he attended the kickoff for a year of events marking the country's upcoming 250th anniversary. "I want to thank Republican congressmen and women, because what they did is incredible," he said. The president complained that Democrats voted against the bill because "they hate Trump — but I hate them too." Trump said he plans to sign the legislation on Friday at the White House. The outcome delivers a milestone for the president and for his party. It was a long-shot effort to compile a lengthy list of GOP priorities into what they called his "one big beautiful bill," at nearly900 pages. With Democrats unified in opposition, the bill will become a defining measure of Trump's return to the White House, aided by Republican control of Congress. "You get tired of winning yet?" saidHouse Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., invoking Trump as he called the vote. "With one big beautiful bill we are going to make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before," he said. Republicans celebrated with a rendition of the Village People's "Y.M.C.A.," a song the president often plays at his rallies, during a ceremony afterward. Tax breaks and safety net cuts At its core, the package's priority is $4.5 trillion in tax breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000deduction for most older adultsearning less than $75,000 a year. There's also a hefty investment, some $350 billion, in national security andTrump's deportation agendaand to help develop the"Golden Dome"defensive system over the U.S. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion in cutbacks tothe Medicaid health careand food stamps, largely by imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people, and a majorrollback of green energy tax credits. Thenonpartisan Congressional Budget Officeestimates the package will add$3.3 trillion to the deficitover the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. "This was a generational opportunity to deliver the most comprehensive and consequential set of conservative reforms in modern history, and that's exactly what we're doing," said Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the House Budget Committee chairman. Democrats united against the big 'ugly bill' Democrats unified against the bill as a tax giveaway to the rich paid for on the backs of the working class and most vulnerable in society, what they called "trickle down cruelty." Jeffries began the speech at 4:53 a.m. EDT and finished at 1:37 p.m. EDT, 8 hours, 44 minutes later, a record, as he argued against what he called Trump's "big ugly bill." "We're better than this," said Jeffries, who used a leader's prerogative for unlimited debate, and read letter after letter from Americans writing about their reliance of the health care programs. "I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying that this is a crime scene," Jeffries said. "It's a crime scene, going after the health, and the safety, and the well-being of the American people." And as Democrats, he said, "We want no part of it." Tensions ran high. As fellow Democrats chanted Jeffries' name, a top Republican, Rep. Jason Smith of Missouri, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, called his speech "a bunch of hogwash." Hauling the package through the Congress has been difficult from the start. Republicans have struggled mightily withthe billnearly every step of the way, quarreling in the House and Senate, and often succeeding only by the narrowest of margins: just one vote. TheSenate passed the package days earlierwith Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie vote. The slim majority in the House left Republicans little room for defections. "It wasn't beautiful enough for me to vote for it," said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky. Also voting no was Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, who said he was concerned about cuts to Medicaid. Once Johnson gaveled the tally, Republicans cheered "USA!" and flashed Trump-style thumbs-up to the cameras. Political costs of saying no Despite their discomfort with various aspects of the sprawling package, in some ways it became too big to fail — in part because Republicans found it difficult to buck Trump. As Wednesday's stalled floor action dragged overnight, Trump railed against the delays. "What are the Republicans waiting for???" the president said in a midnight-hour post. Johnson relied heavily on White House Cabinet secretaries, lawyers and others to satisfy skeptical GOP holdouts. Moderate Republicans worried about the severity of cuts while conservatives pressed for steeper reductions. Lawmakers said they were being told the administration could provide executive actions, projects or other provisions in their districts back home. The alternative was clear. Republicans who staked out opposition to the bill, including Massie of Kentucky and Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, werebeing warnedby Trump's well-funded political operation. Tillis soon after announced he would not seek reelection. Rollback of past presidential agendas In many ways, the package is arepudiation of the agendasof the last two Democratic presidents, a chiseling away at the Medicaid expansion from Barack Obama'sAffordable Care Act, and a pullback of Joe Biden's climate change strategies in theInflation Reduction Act. Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that cuts to Medicaid, which some 80 million Americans rely on, would result in lives lost. Food stamps that help feed more than 40 million people would "rip food from the mouths of hungry children, hungry veterans and hungry seniors," Jeffries said. Republicans say the tax breaks will prevent a tax hike on households and grow the economy. They maintain they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe aswaste, fraud and abuse. The Tax Policy Center, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a $1,750 tax cut for the middle quintile and a $10,950 tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired. ___ Associated Press writers Kevin Freking, Joey Cappelletti and Chris Megerian contributed to this report.

The House gives final approval to Trump's big tax bill in a milestone for his second-term agenda

The House gives final approval to Trump's big tax bill in a milestone for his second-term agenda WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans pro...
Over 100 former senior officials warn against planned staff cuts at US State DepartmentNew Foto - Over 100 former senior officials warn against planned staff cuts at US State Department

By Jonathan Landay and Daphne Psaledakis WASHINGTON (Reuters) -More than 130 retired diplomats and other former senior U.S. officials issued an open letter on Thursday criticizing a planned overhaul of the State Department that could see thousands of employees laid off. "We strongly condemn Secretary of State Marco Rubio's announced decision to implement sweeping staff reductions and reorganization at the U.S. Department of State," the officials said in the letter. The signatories included dozens of former ambassadors and senior officials, including Susan Rice, who served as national security advisor under President Barack Obama, a Democrat. The timing of the cuts remains unclear, with the U.S. Supreme Court expected to weigh in at any moment on a bid by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to halt a judicial order blocking the firings. The administration in late May notified Congress of a plan to overhaul its diplomatic corps that could cut thousands of jobs, including hundreds of members of its elite Foreign Service who advocate for U.S. interests in the face of growing assertiveness from adversaries such as China and Russia. Initial plans to send the notices last month were halted after a federal judge on June 13 temporarily blocked the State Department from implementing the reorganization plan. The shake-up forms part of a push by Trump to shrink the federal bureaucracy, cut what he says is wasteful spending and align what remains with his "America First" priorities. "At a time when the United States faces unprecedented challenges from strategic competitors, ongoing conflicts, and emerging security threats, Secretary Rubio's decision to gut the State Department's institutional knowledge and operational capacity is reckless," the former officials wrote. (Reporting by Jonathan Landay and Daphne Psaledakis, Editing by Rosalba O'Brien)

Over 100 former senior officials warn against planned staff cuts at US State Department

Over 100 former senior officials warn against planned staff cuts at US State Department By Jonathan Landay and Daphne Psaledakis WASHINGTON ...

 

AB JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com