DeSantis set a Florida record for executions. It's driving a national increaseNew Foto - DeSantis set a Florida record for executions. It's driving a national increase

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — In the final moments of a life defined by violence, 60-year-oldEdward Zakrzewskithanked the people of Florida for killing him "in the most cold, calculated, clean, humane, efficient way possible," breathing deeply as a lethal drug cocktail coursed through his veins. With his last breath, strapped to a gurney inside a state prison's death chamber, Zakrzewski paid what Florida had deemed was his debt to society and becamethe 27th personput to death in the U.S. so far this year, the highest number in a decade. Under Republican Gov.Ron DeSantis, Florida has executednine people in 2025, more thanthan any other state, and set a new state record, with DeSantis overseeing more executions in a single year than any other Florida governor since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976. Across the country,more people have been put to deathin the first seven months of this year thanin all of 2024. Florida's increase is helping put the U.S. on track to surpass 2015's total of 28 executions. And the number of executions is expected to keep climbing. Nine more people are scheduled to be put to death in seven states during the remainder of 2025. Florida drives a national increase in executions After the Supreme Court lifted its ban on capital punishment in the '70s, executions steadily increased, peaking in 1999 at 98 deaths. Since then, they had been dropping — in part due to legal battles, a shortage of lethal injection drugs, and declining public support for capital punishment, which has prompted a majority of states to either pause or abolish it altogether. The ratcheting up after this yearslong decline comes as Republican PresidentDonald Trumphas urged prosecutors toaggressively seek the death penaltyand as some GOP-controlled state legislatures have pushed to expand thecategory of crimespunishable by death andthe methods usedtocarry out executions. John Blume, director of the Cornell Death Penalty Project, says the uptick in executions doesn't appear to be linked to a change in public support for the death penalty or an increase in the rate of death sentences, but is rather a function of the discretion of state governors. "The most cynical view would be: It seems to matter to the president, so it matters to them," Blume said of the governors. 'The only appropriate punishment' In response to questions from The Associated Press, a spokesperson for DeSantis pointed to statements the governor made at a press conference in May, saying he takes capital cases "very seriously." "There are some crimes that are just so horrific, the only appropriate punishment is the death penalty," DeSantis said, adding: "these are the worst of the worst." Julie Andrew expressed relief after witnessing theApril executionof the man who killed her sister in the Florida Keys in 2000. "It's done," she said. "My heart felt lighter and I can breathe again." The governor's office did not respond to questions about why the governor is increasing the pace of executions now and whether Trump's policies are playing a role. Deciding who lives and who dies Little is publicly known about how the governor decides whose death warrant to sign and when, a process critics have called "secretive" and "arbitrary." According to the Florida Department of Corrections, there are 266 people currently on death row, including two men in their 80s, both of whom have been awaiting their court-ordered fate for more than 40 years. Speaking at the press conference in May, DeSantis said it's his "obligation" to oversee executions, which he hopes provide "some closure" to victims' families. "Any time we go forward, I'm convinced that not only was the verdict correct, but that this punishment is absolutely appropriate under the circumstances," DeSantis said. US ranks alongside Iran and Saudi Arabia for executions For years, the U.S. has ranked alongside Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Egypt as among the countries carrying out the highest number of confirmed executions. China is thought to execute more of its citizens than any other nation, although the exact totals are considered a state secret, according to the non-profit Death Penalty Information Center. Robin Maher, the center's executive director, says elected officials in the U.S. have long used the death penalty as a "political tool," adding it's "a way of embellishing their own tough-on-crime credentials." Florida executions vary year to year In 2024, DeSantis signed one death warrant. From 2020-2022, Florida didn't carry out a single execution. In 2023, DeSantis oversaw six — the highest number during his time in office until this year. 2023 was also the yearthe governor challenged Trumpfor the Republican presidential nomination. There are a number of reasons why the rate of executions may vary from one administration to the next, said Mark Schlakman, an attorney and Florida State University professor who advised then-governor Lawton Chiles on the death penalty. The availability of staff resources, the tempo of lengthy legal appeals, and court challenges against the death penalty itself can all play a role, Schlakman said, as well as a governor's "sensibilities." 'The one person who can stop this' One execution after another, opponents of the death penalty hold vigils in the Florida capitol, outside the governor's mansion, and near the state prison that houses the death chamber, as people of faith across the state pray for mercy, healing and justice. Suzanne Printy, a volunteer with the group Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, has hand-delivered thousands of petitions to DeSantis' office, but says they seem to have no effect. Recently, DeSantis signed death warrants for two more men scheduled to die later this month. Still, Printy keeps praying. "He's the one person who can stop this," she said. ___ Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative.Report for Americais a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

DeSantis set a Florida record for executions. It's driving a national increase

DeSantis set a Florida record for executions. It's driving a national increase TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — In the final moments of a life d...
After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echoNew Foto - After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo

NEW YORK (AP) — It would seem the most straightforward of notions: A thing takes place, and it goes into the history books or is added to museum exhibits. But whether something even gets remembered and how — particularly when it comes to the history of a country and its leader — is often the furthest thing from simple. The latest example of that came Friday, when theSmithsonian Institutionsaid ithad removed a referenceto the 2019 and 2021 impeachments of PresidentDonald Trumpfrom a panel in an exhibition about the American presidency. Trump has pressed institutions and agencies under federal oversight, often through the pressure of funding, to focus on the country's achievements and progress and away from things he terms "divisive." A Smithsonian spokesperson said the removal of the reference, which had been installed as part of a temporary addition in 2021, came after a review of "legacy content recently" and the exhibit eventually "will include all impeachments." There was no time frame given for when; exhibition renovations can be time- and money-consuming endeavors. In a statement that did not directly address the impeachment references, White House spokesperson Davis Ingle said: "We are fully supportive of updating displays to highlight American greatness." But is history intended to highlight or to document — to report what happened, or to serve a desired narrative? The answer, as with most things about the past, can be intensely complex. It's part of a larger effort around American stories The Smithsonian's move comes in the wake of Trump administration actions likeremoving the nameof a gay rights activist from a Navy ship, pushing for Republican supporters in Congress todefund the Corporation for Public Broadcastingand getting rid of theleadership at the Kennedy Center. "Based on what we have been seeing, this is part of a broader effort by the president to influence and shape how history is depicted at museums, national parks, and schools," said Julian E. Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University. "Not only is he pushing a specific narrative of the United States but, in this case, trying to influence how Americans learn about his own role in history." It's not a new struggle, in the world generally and the political world particularly. There is power in being able to shape how things are remembered, if they are remembered at all — who was there, who took part, who was responsible, what happened to lead up to that point in history. And the human beings who run things have often extended their authority to the stories told about them. In China, for example, references to the June 1989 crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing's Tiananmen Square are forbidden and meticulously regulated by the ruling Communist Party government. In Soviet-era Russia, officials who ran afoul of leaders like Josef Stalin disappeared not only from the government itself but from photographs and history books where they once appeared. Jason Stanley, an expert on authoritarianism, said controlling what and how people learn of their past has long been used as a vital tool to maintain power. Stanley has made his views about the Trump administration clear; he recently left Yale University to join the University of Toronto, citing concerns over the U.S. political situation. "If they don't control the historical narrative," he said, "then they can't create the kind of fake history that props up their politics." It shows how the presentation of history matters In the United States, presidents and their families have always used their power to shape history and calibrate their own images. Jackie Kennedy insisted on cuts in William Manchester's book on her husband's 1963 assassination, "The Death of a President." Ronald Reagan and his wife got a cable TV channel to release a carefully calibrated documentary about him. Those around Franklin D. Roosevelt, including journalists of the era, took pains to mask the impact that paralysis had on his body and his mobility. Trump, though, has taken it to a more intense level — a sitting president encouraging an atmosphere where institutions can feel compelled to choose between him and the truth — whether he calls for it directly or not. "We are constantly trying to position ourselves in history as citizens, as citizens of the country, citizens of the world," said Robin Wagner-Pacifici, professor emerita of sociology at the New School for Social Research. "So part of these exhibits and monuments are also about situating us in time. And without it, it's very hard for us to situate ourselves in history because it seems like we just kind of burst forth from the Earth." Timothy Naftali, director of the Richard M. Nixon Presidential Library and Museum from 2007 to 2011, presided over its overhaul to offer a more objective presentation of Watergate — one not beholden to the president's loyalists. In an interview Friday, he said he was "concerned and disappointed" about the Smithsonian decision. Naftali, now a senior researcher at Columbia University, said museum directors "should have red lines" and that he considered removing the Trump panel to be one of them. While it might seem inconsequential for someone in power to care about a museum's offerings, Wagner-Pacifici says Trump's outlook on history and his role in it — earlier this year, he said the Smithsonian had "come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology" — shows how important those matters are to people in authority. "You might say about that person, whoever that person is, their power is so immense and their legitimacy is so stable and so sort of monumental that why would they bother with things like this ... why would they bother to waste their energy and effort on that?" Wagner-Pacifici said. Her conclusion: "The legitimacy of those in power has to be reconstituted constantly. They can never rest on their laurels." ___

After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo

After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo NEW YORK (AP) — It would seem the mos...
Supreme Court raises the stakes in a Louisiana redistricting caseNew Foto - Supreme Court raises the stakes in a Louisiana redistricting case

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday expanded the scope of a Louisiana congressional redistricting dispute that has been pending for months by ordering new briefing on a legal question that could further weaken the landmark Voting Rights Act. The courtissued an orderasking the lawyers to address whether, in seeking to comply with the 1965 law that protects minority voting rights, Louisiana violated the Constitution's 14th and 15th Amendments enacted after the Civil War to ensure Black people were treated equally under the law. If the court rules that the state did violate the Constitution, it would mean states cannot cite the need to comply with the Voting Rights Act if they use race as a consideration during the map-drawing process, as they currently can. Rick Hasen, an election law expert at the UCLA School of Law, wrote on hisElection Law Blogthat the order "appears to put the constitutionality of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act into question." That provision bars voting practices or rules that discriminate against minority groups. The Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority is often receptive to arguments that the Constitution is "colorblind," meaning no consideration of race can ever be lawful even if it is aimed at remedying past discrimination. In 2013, the court struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act in a case from Alabama and further weakened it in a2021 case from Arizona. The justices heard arguments in the Louisiana case on more technical, less contentious questions in March and was originally expected to issue a ruling by the end of June. Even then,the constitutional issue loomed large. The new order did not indicate whether the court will hear another round of arguments before it issues a ruling in the case. The Louisiana map in question, which is currently in effect, includes two majority-Black districts for the first time in years. The complicated case arose from litigation over an earlier map drawn by the state legislature after the 2020 census that included just one Black-majority district out of the state's six districts. About a third of the state's population is Black. Civil rights groups, including the Legal Defense Fund, won a legal challenge, arguing that the Voting Rights Act required two majority-Black districts. But after the new map was drawn, a group of self-identified "non-African American" voters led by Phillip Callais and 11 other plaintiffs filed another lawsuit, saying the latest map violated the 14th Amendment. As recently as 2023, the Supreme Courtreaffirmed the Voting Rights Actin a congressional redistricting case arising from Alabama. But conservatives raised questions about whether key elements of the law should ultimately be struck down.

Supreme Court raises the stakes in a Louisiana redistricting case

Supreme Court raises the stakes in a Louisiana redistricting case WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday expanded the scope of a Louisiana...
Track and field championship highlights: Vashti Cunningham leaps for gold, Melissa Jefferson-Wooden makes statement in 100New Foto - Track and field championship highlights: Vashti Cunningham leaps for gold, Melissa Jefferson-Wooden makes statement in 100

EUGENE, Ore. —Vashti Cunninghamleaped her way to another U.S. title. Cunningham cleared the bar at 6 feet, 5 ½ inches to win the women's high jump at the U.S. track and field championships. It's her season-best mark. It's Cunningham's seventh national title. The win earned the 27-year-old jumper a trip to next month's world championships in Tokyo, Japan. Sha'Carri Richardson arrested in alleged domestic violence incident, police say Cunningham told reporters Friday's victory boosted her confidence ahead of the world championships. "I don't think I've ever been so happy about a win in my life," Cunningham said after the win. "I've had a rough season and it's just been long. When you don't know what it's gonna look like at the end, you're just going through it day by day. Feels so long and so exhausting. You're wondering, like, 'Was I just good for a moment?' But today, God really showed up for me. I think (the win) has re-sparked my confidence." Cunningham's father, Randall,was an NFL quarterback for 16 seasons. USA TODAY Sports is on the ground in Eugene and has the highlights from Day 2 at Hayward Field: Bednarek ran a personal-best 9.79 to win his first national championship in what was a competitive 100. Bednarek got a good start, created just enough separation around the 80-meter mark and crossed the finish line in first place. Remarkably, Bednarek told reporters he started feeling cramps in both his calves roughly 50 meters into the race, but was able to withstand the slight discomfort. "I knew I was capable of running that time," Bednarek said. "Having a cramp in the middle (of the race) and not being able to push the way I wanted to toward the end, I know I have something way faster than that." Courtney Lindsey took second with a time of 9.82 and T'Mars McCallum placed third, clocking in at 9.83. Bednarek, Lindsey and McCallum all recorded personal bests in the event as they qualified for the world championships. "It's about damn time," Bednarek said after winning his first national championship. "I always knew I had the capability of doing it but I just had to believe in myself. This year I feel like I started living up to my expectations." Noah Lyles scratched from the 100 competition. Lyles ran a 10.05 to win his preliminary heat in the men's 100 on Thursday but elected not to compete on Friday. Lyles already qualified for the 100 at the world championships by virtue of being the defending champion. There was no doubt who the winner was in the women's 100. Jefferson-Wooden led from start to finish in what was a convincing victory, running a personal-best and world-leading time of 10.65. It's tied for the fifth fastest time in the history of the event. "Amazing," Jefferson-Wooden said following the win. "I've been dreaming of days like this, and it's finally starting to come true. Right now the sky is the limit. I just got to keep working toward bigger and better things." Kayla White (10.84) and Aleia Hobbs (10.92) rounded out the top three. Most of the news came before the women's 100 final. Sha'Carri Richardson withdrew from the 100 at the U.S. championships on Friday. Richardson wasarrested earlier this week for an alleged domestic violence incident. The sprinter does have a bye into this year's world championships in the 100 as the reigning champion. The 25-year-old sprinter has elected to run in Sunday's 200, according to USA track and field. McLaughlin-Levrone left the other sprinters behind her in the preliminary round of the women's 400. McLaughlin-Levrone raced to an early lead and cruised the final 150 meters. She crossed the finish line with a time of 49.59. She has the fastest time entering the semifinals. McLaughlin-Levrone is the 400-meter hurdles world-record holder and two-time Olympic champion in the event, but decided to run the open 400 this season. The teenage phenom raced to a fourth-place finish in the opening round of the men's 400. Wilson had a late surge but was unable to pass the three runners ahead of him. Wilson's time of 45.39 wasn't good enough to qualify for the next round. Wilson made head waves last year for earning a spot on the U.S. Olympic team. The 17-year-old owns the under-18 400 world record with a time of 44.10. Follow USA TODAY Sports' Tyler Dragon on X@TheTylerDragon. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Vashti Cunningham leaps for gold, Melissa Jefferson-Wooden makes statement in 100

Track and field championship highlights: Vashti Cunningham leaps for gold, Melissa Jefferson-Wooden makes statement in 100

Track and field championship highlights: Vashti Cunningham leaps for gold, Melissa Jefferson-Wooden makes statement in 100 EUGENE, Ore. —Vas...
Cincinnati Bengals and Hamilton County finalize new lease, $470M deal to renovate Paycor StadiumNew Foto - Cincinnati Bengals and Hamilton County finalize new lease, $470M deal to renovate Paycor Stadium

TheCincinnati Bengalsand Hamilton County finalized a new 11-year lease on Friday that includes $470 million in renovations to Paycor Stadium. Hamilton County commissioners approved a version of the lease on Thursday but the Bengals did not sign because they had not seen the version that county officials approved. Both sides negotiated through the night before the Bengals signed off and commissioners approved during a special meeting on Friday. The lease keeps the team at their downtown home through at least 2036. It also includes 10 additional option years that could extend it through June 2046. "The Bengals thank Hamilton County and its Commissioners for demonstrating leadership and taking steps that continue moving Cincinnati forward," Bengals Executive Vice President Katie Blackburn said in a statement. "It solidifies the future of the Bengals in Cincinnati, our beloved home, for many years to come. Today's deal embodies a responsible approach for the future, while at the same time keeping Paycor Stadium a great venue that can provide our great fans the great gameday experience they deserve." The county will contribute $350 million toward the renovations, and the Bengals will pay $120 million. The plan is far less than the $830 million the Bengals originally proposed. The Bengals and Hamilton County will also work to secure state funding. The Cleveland Browns are receiving $600 million from unclaimed funds in Ohio's budget recently signed by Gov. Mike DeWine. The Browns are planning to build a new domed stadium in Brookpark, Ohio, near Cleveland Hopkins International Airport. The Bengals have proposed improvements to the club lounges, stadium suites, concessions and scoreboards. A permanent indoor facility is also on the long-term wish list. Cincinnati was the only northern NFL team without an indoor practice facility for many seasons until 2022, when it added an indoor practice bubble across the street from its outdoor fields. Owner Mike Brown said on July 21 that the planned improvements and requests were in line with other medium- to small-market NFL franchises. "We aren't looking for fancy, new things," Brown said. "We're going to try to spruce up the club area. There are some areas around and about in the concession area. There are things that are going to be improved but we aren't going to put a dome over the top. We aren't going to put a mammoth scoreboard in. It is going to be what it has been, pretty much, and I don't think there's anything wrong with that." The Bengals have called Paycor Stadium home since 2000. It was originally named Paul Brown Stadium until the teamsold the naming rightsin August 2022. The finalized lease wraps up what had been a long and at times contentious period of negotiations between Hamilton County and the Bengals. The original 1996 lease has been cited by many as what city, county or state governments should not do when trying to build a new stadium or arena for a team and giving that franchise too much control of the process. "We stood firm on what we thought was best. I think that this lease agreement is good for the people and the team. This I feel is the people's lease and I feel proud of that," Stephanie Summerow Dumas, one of Hamilton County's three commissioners, said on Friday. ___ AP NFL:https://apnews.com/hub/nfl

Cincinnati Bengals and Hamilton County finalize new lease, $470M deal to renovate Paycor Stadium

Cincinnati Bengals and Hamilton County finalize new lease, $470M deal to renovate Paycor Stadium TheCincinnati Bengalsand Hamilton County fi...

 

AB JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com